My Take on the Debate

Team:

I have only seen parts of debates between American candidates but, comparing to these, the team has done a very good job. The debate was very well organized and the anchors did their jobs very well. Yet, it started 15 minutes later than it should have and was very highly commercialized. Also the fact that it started at 9:15 and ended after 2:00 am was very....tiring! There should be some analysis afterwards too done by some experts.

Amr Moussa:

I thought Amr Moussa would have done much better than that, luckily he didn't. Being a diplomatic person, he nearly didn't answer any question clearly. He was very nervous and ill-tempered and was angered very very easily many times. He was also very bumptious and snobbish and looked down (literally) to everyone. He also moved too much and made very stupid gestures. His answers to the anchor's questions were not good, but his questions to Abo El Fotooh got him many times and made him look like an Islamist who's on the very right of Islamists, although he might not be so. His answers to Abo El Fotooh's questions weren't as good most of the times, but he was also able to turn Abo El Fotooh's questions at him at other times. He didn't win any new ground, but with his talk about security and stability, he made his supporters happy.

Abd El Moniem Abo El Fotooh:

Abo El Fotooh was much better than I thought he would be. His answers to most questions were straight and clear. His questions to Amr Moussa were not as strong, he only focused on him being part of the old regime although there were so many things that he could put against Amr Moussa, including his ill temper during the debate. Abo El Fotooh's team didn't do their homework about Amr Moussa as much as they should have done. Abo El Fotooh has proven, yet again, to be a man of morals by being very polite even when Amr Moussa was very very rude and angry. He was the one who went to shake hands with Moussa before and after the debate. He was a lot more calm and relaxed and smiled a lot more. Again, Abo El Fotooh didn't win any new ground, but has done very well for his supporters. His part about El Benaa and Tameya party was disastrous, how come he can forgive someone who killed Egyptians, but not forgive someone from the old regime? Again, some of his answers, very important ones too, were very diplomatic and he almost didn't answer. It was like he only cared about winning Islamists and nothing more.

The Winner

Nobody, as I've said, they made their supporters happy, but the rest probably didn't change their minds.  They both have done equally good and bad.  Being not a supporter of both, the only result I came out with after this debate is that Amr Moussa is a lot more awful than I thought he is. Him winning the elections would be a disaster for me and the revolution. I don't support Abo El Fotooh, at all, but I'd rather have him winning than Amr Moussa by any means.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Legend of Osiris, Moral of the Legend

Image
First let me say that most of the extraction of lessons in this post isn't done by me, but by the person who has opened my eyes to the beautiful myth. Yet I also have to say that when I did my own research, and read it from different sources, I found even more lessons to learn. And that's the beauty of it, with every time you read it you learn something new. So to the moral of the Myth of Osiris.... It's clear that the fight between Horus and Seth is a fight between good and evil, between what's rightful and what's wrong, between what's true and what's fake. Horus had an intelligent mind that lead him to fight for the truth. Seth had an intellect mind that made him able to give excuses for his helpers, to brainwash them, or to give them fake reason to fight his fake war. Horus, with the wisdom of his mother and a father who holds the truth had the sharp vision of a hawk. But what is vision to our ancestors? What is the eye of Horus? What does it stand for...
Read more

Egypt Uprising 2013: One Last Push

Image
June 29, 2013 Tamarod Tamarod (Rebel), the public movement that has been collecting signatures for the past two months to call for early presidential elections with the aim of finding a legal way to topple President Mohamed Morsi, announced the final signature count in a press conference this morning. The number announced was 22,134,465 signatures. Mahmoud Badr, the movement's founder, made a call for more than 22 million people to join the protests tomorrow and stay in the streets until they bring Morsi down. He also announced that the president's legitimacy has fallen after they've collected a number of signatures th at is more than 85% of the number of voters in the presidential elections. Badr answered those who question the number by demanding early elections, saying that this was the only way to prove the accuracy of either of their numbers. The announcement was met with celebratory reactions among many Egyptians...   Support Since April 6 movement...
Read more

Who Voted for Shafiq?

After standing in a line with the Heliopolis ladies who were mostly voting for Shafiq, I came back home wondering why would anyone do such thing? The most popular answer I got from the ladies was in fear of Ikhwan. Knowing that the percentage of Christians here is more than in other places, and knowing that us, the ladies of Heliopolis, can never live the life of Ikhwan with what Azza El Garf says about FGM and sexual harassment laws, with forcing us to wear or not wear something (even the veiled of us), with having men control our lives, with having someone control our religious practices it makes sense to be against Ikhwan. And being one of those ladies, I too am against Ikhwan and anyone who mixes religion with politics. Now this takes out Morsy (although I know a few who voted for him), and maybe Abo El Fotooh for some. So then I asked why not Sabahy? And they were all against him because of being a Nasserist because they're families were put under great harm because of nationa...
Read more